Effect of Project Design on Sustainability of World Vision Community Development Projects in North Rift Kenya
Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology,
Sustainability of the funded projects is of utmost importance if the impact of funding these projects is to be realized. Despite project feasibility studies being done prior to commencement of the projects, sustainability is still not guaranteed. Thus, the main purpose of the study was to identify the effect of project design on sustainability of World Vision community development projects in North Rift Kenya. This study was guided by systems theory. The research used cross sectional survey design. The target population was 1500 respondents’ four County project managers, 20 project officers, 40 project coordinators, 20 accountants, 240 CDF facilitators and 240 community members. The researcher adopted stratified, simple random and purposive sampling technique to select respondent. The sample size was 316 respondents comprising of four County project managers, 11 project officers, 22 project coordinators, 11 accountants, 133 CDF facilitators and 133 community members to participate in the study. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Descriptive statistics included frequencies and percentages. Regression was used to test the hypotheses. Descriptive statistics included frequencies and percentages. Regression was used to test the hypotheses. Project design had a significant influence on sustainability of World Vision community development projects (β1=0.403, p<0.05). To improve Kenya’s rating on sustainability, the government needs to focus on the training of beneficiaries on sustainability so that they can take full control of the project when the financial support has come to an end. In addition, incorporation of sustainability into project design, and provision of support beyond the project completion is critical in ensuring that World Vision projects are sustainable.
How to Cite
Rondinelli DA. Development projects as policy experiments: An adaptive approach to development administration. London: Routledge; 2013.
Ika LA. Project management for development; Why projects are failing and what can be done about it. Project Management Journal. 2012;43(4):27-41.
Ika LA, Hodgson D. Proceedings of the 5th making projects critical. Bristol Business School, England: Briston; 2011.
Young ST, Dhanda KK. Sustainability: Essentials for business. London: SAGE Publications; 2012.
Hienerth C, Von Hippel E, Jensen MB. User community vs. producer innovation development efficiency: A first empirical study. Research Policy. 2014;43(1):190-201.
Schwerhoff G, Sy M. Financing renewable energy in Africa–Key challenge of the sustainable development goals. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;75(6):393-401.
Rousseau D. Systems philosophy and the unity of knowledge. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 2014;31(2):146-159.
Barasa F, Jelagat T. Community participation in project planning, management and implementation: Building the foundation for sustainable development. International Journal of Current Research. 2013;5(2):398-400.
Caldas C, Gupta A. Critical factors impacting the performance of mega-projects. Journal of Civil Engineering. 2017;16(1):19-27.
Maraga S, Namosha E, Gouda H, Vallely L, Rare L, Phuanukoonnon S. Socio-demographic factors associated with maternal health care utilization in Wosera, East Sepik Province, Papua New Guinea. Papua New Guinea Medical Journal. 2011;54(4):154-170.
Louangrath P. Sample size determination for non-finite population. Southeast- Asian J. of Sciences. 2014;3(2):141- 152.
Best JW, Kahn JV. Research in education. Pearson Education India; 2016.
Abstract View: 378 times
PDF Download: 159 times