Main Article Content
A genotype is considered to be most adaptive / stable, when it registers high mean yield but show a minimum interaction with the environment. Knowledge of genotype × environment interaction and yield stability are important parameters in breeding new cultivars with improved adaptation to environmental constraints prevailing in the target environments. Therefore, an effort was made to know the genotype - environment interaction and to identify stable single cross hybrids across the environments. Eight newly synthesized single cross maize hybrids and 7 checks were evaluated in a Randomized Block Design with three replications during Rabi-2016 across three locations spread over different agro-climatic zones of Karnataka state, India. Different stability parameters as suggested by Eberhart and Russell  were estimated. Joint analysis of variance revealed significant differences among environments, hybrids and environments × hybrids interactions advocating the adequacy of stability analysis. Hybrids, viz., MAI 349×MAI 283, KDMI 16×BGUDI 118 were stable for days to anthesis and silking, respectively. Whereas, hybrids viz., KDMI 16×BGUDI 118, BGUDI 120×VL 109252 and MAI 283× KDMI 16 registered mean values lower than the overall mean with bi value nearer to unity and non significant S2di for anthesis silking interval. Hybrid, MAI 349×MAI 283 for plant height and cob length, KDMI 16×MAI 283 for cob length, number of kernel rows-1 and 100 grain weight, BGUDI 88×MAI 349 for cob diameter, MAI 394×BGUDI 88 for shelling % and KDMI 16×BGUDI 118 for grain yield plant-1 registered stable performance across the environments. Based on the positive and negative environmental indices, production environment at location 1 (K Block UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru), was most favorable for expression of majority of characters studied. Hybrid KDMI 16×MAI 283 was found stable across the environments for most of the characters studied.
Maize Vision 2022: A knowledge report, 5th Edition of India Maize Summit Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI), Pricewaterhouse Coopers Private Limited; 2018.
Finlay VKW, Wilkinson GN. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 1963;14:742-754.
Natalia de Leon, Jean-Luc Jannink, Jode W. Edwards, Shawn M Kaeppler. Introduction to a special issue on Genotype by Environment Interaction. Crop Science. 2016;56(5):2081-2089.
Usha Rani G. Stability analysis in maize (Zea mays L.). M.Sc (Agri.), Thesis, Acharya NG. Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad; 2012.
Campbell BT, Jones MA. Assessment of genotype × environment interactions for yield and fibre quality in cotton performance trials. Euphytica. 2005;144: 69-78.
Dewdar MDH. Stability analysis and genotype x environment interactions of some Egyptian cotton cultivars cultivated. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2013;8(41):5156-5160.
Sirlene Viana Faria, Luiz Silva Luz, Mateus Cupertino Rodrigues, José Eustáquio de Souza Carneiro, Pedro Crescencio Souza Carneiro, Rodrigo Oliveira De Lima. Adaptability and stability in commercial maize hybrids in the southeast of the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Agronomic Science Magazine. 2017;48(2):347-357.
Gami RA, Patel JM, Chaudhar SM, Chaudhary GK. Genotype-environment relations and stability analysis in different land races of maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2017; 6(8):418-424.
Matin MQI, Rusul Golam Md, Aminul Islam AKM, Khaleque Mian MA, Ahmed JU, Amiuzzaman M. Stability analysis for yield and yield contributing characters in hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). African Journal of. Agricultural Research. 2017;12(37):2795-2806.
Nirmal Raj R, Renuka Devi CP, Gokulakrishnan J. G X E interaction and stability analysis of maize hybrids using Eberhart and Russell Model. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology. 2019;12(1):01-06.
Rahman H, Durreshawar, Ali S, Iftikhar F, Khalil IH, Shah SMA, Ahmad H. Stability analysis of maize hybrids across North West of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2017;42(2):1083-1091.
Khalil MAG. Stability Analysis for promising yellow maize hybrids under different locations. Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Research. 2013;58(3):279-286.
Syed Towseef Ahmad, Ali G, Dar ZA, Bhat MA, Abidi I, Lone AA, Ahangar MA, Kamaldin, Lone RA, Vaid AR. Stability analysis in high altitude single cross maize hybrids under temperate niches. Plant Archives. 2017;17(2):1630-1634.
Nadagoud VK, Jagadeesha RC, Wali MC, Kachapur RM. Genetic studies on stability among maize inbred lines. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2012;25 (1):124-126.
Karadavut U, Akilli A. Genotype-environment interaction and phenotypic stability analysis for yield of corn cultivar. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2012;2(5):220-223.
Sowmya HH, Kamatar MY, Shanthakumar G, Brunda SM, Shadakshari TV, Showkath Babu BM, Sanjeev Singh Rajput. Stability analysis of maize hybrids using Eberhart and Russel Model. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2018;7(2):3336-3343.
Carlos Busanello, Velci Queiróz de Souza, Antonio Costa de Oliveira, Maicon Nardino, Diego Beretta, Braulio Otomar Caron, Denise Schmidt, Victoria Freitas de Oliveira, Valmor Antonio Konflaz. Adaptability and stability of corn hybrids in Southern Brazilian environments. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2015;7(9):228-235.
Ravindra Babu S, Gokulakrishnan J, Ramkrishna S. Stability analysis using various parametric and non parametric methods in single and three- way cross hybrids of maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Botany Studies. 2017;2(6):58-64.
Emre Lker, Fatma Aykut Tonk, Onder Çaylak, Muzaffer Tosun, Lker Ozmen. Assessment of genotype×environment interactions for grain yield in maize hybrids using AMMI and GGE bi- plot analyses. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 2009; 14(2):123-135.
Lalisa Ararsa, Habtamu Zeleke, Mandefro Nigusse. Genotype by environment interaction and yield stability of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids in Ethiopia. Journal of Natural Sciences Research. 2016;6(13): 93-101.