Morphological and Physiological Diversity of Native Fluorescent Pseudomonads from Eastern India

Main Article Content

Annu Kumari Gupta
Erayya .
N. Vijay
A. Srinivasaraghavan

Abstract

The potential negative effect of agrochemicals on the global environment and the cost associated with production lead to research for replacing the chemical fertilizers with bacterial inoculants. Pseudomonas fluorescens an important biocontrol agent because of its ability to induce plant growth and fungicidal/fungistatic activity. The native population of these rhizobacteria plays an important role in sustainable agriculture as they majorly dominate the rhizosphere. In the present study native, twenty-six fluorescent Pseudomonad cultures were isolated from the rhizospheric soil samples collected from the different locations of Zone 3A, Bihar and evaluated for their morphological and physiological diversity. Among the sixteen fluorescent pseudomonads tested, twelve of them produced round to oval colonies on Kings B medium. Of the sixteen isolates ascertained WHSB was produced maximum (51.33 x10‑8) number of colonies on Kings B medium followed by MSSB (28.33 X10‑8), BRKH (26.67 x10‑8) and TMSB (26.00 x10‑8). Fluorescent pseudomonad isolates varied slightly in their colony colour like green, dull-white, whitish-yellow and yellow on culture medium, the pH of 7.5 and glucose as a carbon source found best for the growth of fluorescent pseudomonads. The present work may use to develop effective formulations of potential fluorescent pseudomonads for management of soil-borne plant pathogens. 

Keywords:
Diversity, fluorescent pseudomonads, morphology, native population.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kumari Gupta, A., ., E., Vijay, N., & Srinivasaraghavan, A. (2020). Morphological and Physiological Diversity of Native Fluorescent Pseudomonads from Eastern India. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 38(6), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2019/v38i630459
Section
Original Research Article

References

Harman GE. Seed treatment for biological control of plant diseases. Crop Protection. 1991;10:166-171.

Cook RS, Baker KF. The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens. American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, Minn. 1983;539-542.

Singh HB. Management of plant pathogens with microorganisms. Proc. Indian Natn. Sci. Acad. 2014;80:443-454.

Anwer MA. Biopesticides and bioagents: Novel tools for pest management. Apple Academic Press Publication, USA. 2017; 420.

Wahab S. Biotechnological approaches in management of plant pests, diseases and weeds for sustainable agriculture. J. Biopestic. 2009;2(2):115-134.

Junaid JM, Dar NA, Bhat TA, Bhat AH, Bhat MA. Commercial biocontrol agents and their mechanism of action in the management of plant pathogens. International Journal of Modern Plant & Animal Sciences. 2013;1(2):39-57.

Egamberdiyeva D. Characterization of Pseudomonas sp. isolated from the rhizosphere of plant grown in Serozem soil, semi-arid region of Uzbekistan. The Scientific World Journal. 2005;5:501-509.

Haggag WM, Soud MA. Production and optimization of Pseudomonas fluorescens biomass and metabolites for biocontrol of strawberry Grey mould. American Journal of Plant Science. 2012;3:836-845.

O’Sullivan DJ, O’Gara F. Traits of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Involved in suppression of plant root pathogens. Microbiological Reviews. 1992;56:662- 676.

Van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM, Pieterse CMJ. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 1998;36:453-483.

Angayarkanni T, Kamalakannan A, Santhini E, Pradeepa D. Identification of biochemical markers for the selection of Pseudomonas fluorescens against Pythium spp. In: Asian Conference on Emerging Trends in Plant-Microbe Interactions. Madras University, Chennai. 2005;295-303.

Gaur R, Shani N, Kawaljeet Johri BN, Rossi P, Aragno M. Diacetyl phloroglucinol-producing Pseudomonas do not influence AM fungi in wheat rhizosphere. Current Science. 2004;86: 453-457.

Ramamoorthy V, Raguchander T, Samiyappan R. Enhancing resistance of tomato and hot pepper to Pythium diseases by seed treatment with fluorescent pseudomonads. European Jounal Plant Pathology. 2002;108: 429-441.

Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Clemet C, Barka EA. Use of plant growth- promoting rhizobacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: Principles mechanism of action and future prospects. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2015;74: 4951-4959.

Tonelli ML, Taurian T, Ibanez F, Angelini J, Fabra A. Selection and in-vitro characterization of biocontrol agents with potential to protect peanut plants against fungal pathogens. J. Pl. Pathol. 2010;92: 73-82.

Vlassak KL, Van H, Duchateau L. Isolation and characterization of fluorescent Pseudomonas associated with the roots of rice and banana grown in Srilanka. Plant and Soil. 1992;145:51-63.

Vogel AI. Inorganic Quantitative Analysis. Longman Green and Co., Toronto. 1951; 372-375.

Wasi S, Tabrez S, Ahmad M. Isolation and characterization of a Pseudomonas fluorescens strain tolerant to major Indian water pollutants. Journal of Bioremediation and Biodegradation. 2010;1(1):1000101.

Rekha V, Ahmed John S, Shankar T. Antibacterial activity of Pseudomonas fluorescens isolated from rhizosphere soil. International Journal of Biological Technology. 2010;1(3):10-14.

Babu GP, Paramageetham C. Biological control of Sclerotium by Pseudomonas fluorescens isolated from forest soils. CIB Tech Journal of Microbiology. 2013;3(1): 18-23.

Soesanto L, Mugiastuti E, Rahayuniati RF. Morphological and physiological features of Pseudomonas fluorescens P60; 2016.
Available:http://www. researchgate.net /publication / 215522236
(Accessed dated 9/10/2016)

Meera T, Balabaskar P. Isolation and characterization of Pseudomonas fluorescens from rice fields. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine. 2012;30:112-119.